It's Not You; It's Me. Okay, Maybe It's a Little Bit You.

Introduction

As gifted individuals we are often faced with the question of "How smart are you?" Despite the fact that this question is so common, it offers very little insight into who we are, or what we are truly capable of. A better question (and one which we are going to begin to answer through this WebQuest) is; How are you smart? 

We are able to seek to find an answer to this question as a result of the work of Howard Gardner who, in the 1980’s first began the discussion of Multiple Intelligences and gave us a new way to consider how people are intelligent.

What is (are) Multiple Intelligences?

Before Howard Gardner advanced the theory of Multiple Intelligences, intelligence was essentially approached as a yes or no proposition. Either you were intelligent or not (to simplify matters slightly). Gardner suggested that intelligence can exist on multiple scales or intelligences. We all know at least one person who might be bad at math but is an incredible artist; or who doesn’t like to talk much but who is a whiz at math. These individuals are not odd or strange (at least not because of what we are talking about now) they are merely demonstrating their Multiple Intelligences strengths.

Task

 

Learn about the theory of Multiple Intelligences and to determine (in multiple ways) your own Multiple Intelligence strength(s).

YOUR FINAL PROJECT WILL INCLUDE:

Journal entries.

A standardized test designed to help you to determine your Multiple Intelligence strength(s).

A Multiple Intelligence folder (on Google Docs). This will include one task which is indicative of each of the Multiple Intelligences. 

THESE ARE THINGS THAT YOU WILL BE DOING:

  • Read about the idea of Multiple Intelligences.
  • Determine your Multiple Intelligence strength(s)
  • Reflect (in your journals) upon the idea of intelligence as a single construct or a multi-faceted construct.
  • Reflect (in your journals) upon what your Multiple intelligence strength is and how that may impact your life.
  • Create an i-Pod play list which describes your approach to life and or learning.
  • Create a pictorial college collage.
  • Reflect (in your journals) upon the impact that approaching the idea of intelligence as a multiple rather than singular construct could have on your relationships with others.
  • Create a graph which depicts your Multiple Intelligence strengths in descending order, based on the results of a Multiple Intelligence survey.
  • Create a weather diary which describes the daily weather and how it affects your mood to participate in activities.
  • Reflect (in your journals) as to whether or not we should have a sense of duty to our fellow humanity because we have intelligence strengths and/or abilities.
  • Reflect (in your journals) about the similarities and/or differences between academic talent and athletic talent. 
Process

Ok. Let's get started.

As you move through this WebQuest you will take a brief view of what is meant by the term Multiple Intelligences as well as what they are. You will then have the opportunity to participate in activities which are associated with each Multiple Inteligence. You will finally be asked to reflect on your preference of activities and compare that to the results of a Multiple Intelligence inventory.

 

1. First you will follow this link to a YouTube presentation which has been created to briefly inform of the theory of Multiple Intelligences. Once you reach the link view the presentation while considering which multiple intelligence you may best identify with.

2. Write a journal entry using the following prompt. All journal entries will be shared with me via Google Docs. Expectations for the reflections can be found in the reflection rubric found under the evaluation tab.

   What impact could approaching the idea of intelligence as a multiple rather than singular construct have on your relationships with others.

  3. Throughout the duration of this WebQuest you will create and maintain a weather diary which describes the daily weather and how it affects your mood to participate in activities. See Weather Diary Rubric under the evaluations tab. This diary (when completed) will be shared with me via Google Docs.

4. In order to get a general idea of your Multiple Intelligence strength(s) you will follow this link and take the quiz to determine your Multiple Intelligence strength(s).

5. Reflect (in your journals) upon what your Multiple intelligence strength is (according to the quiz you just took) and how that may impact your life. Share with me via Google Docs.

6. View this musical montage about Multiple Intelligences.

7. Create an i-Pod play list of 5 songs which describes your approach to life and or learning. Do this by creating a Google Doc and entering the link to 5 songs and/or music videos which you think are descriptive of you and a brief description as to why they do. Share with me via Google Docs.

8. Create a graph using Google Docs which depicts your Multiple Intelligence strengths in descending order, based on the results of the Multiple Intelligence survey you took earlier in this WebQuest. Share with me via Google Docs.

9. Write a journal entry using the following prompt. We should have a sense of duty to our fellow humanity because we have intelligence strengths and/or abilities.

10. Pretend that you have to decide where you intend to go to college today. Choose your college then create a pictorial college collage. This collage should reflect what can be expected of life for a student at that college as well as why that college is the best possible choice for you at this time. Use appropriate internet images and share with me via Google Docs. See rubric located under the evaluation tab for grading criteria.

11. Write a journal entry using the following prompt. What are the similarities and/or differences between academic talent and athletic talent? Share with me via Google Docs.

Evaluation

Reflection Rubric 

Criteria

4

3

2

1

Structure Ideas (x2)

All or almost all of the entries have a connection to structure.

Most entries have a connection to structure.

Few entries have a connection to structure.

None of the entries have a connection to structure.

Feelings and Thoughts           (x2)

Feelings and thoughts are revealed in all or almost of the entries.

Feelings and thoughts are revealed in most entries.

Feelings and thoughts are revealed in few of the entries.

None of your feelings and thoughts are revealed in any of the entries.

Format

The proper format has been followed for all of the entries.

The proper format has been followed for most of the entries.

The proper format has been followed for few of the entries.

The proper format has not been followed for any of the entries.

Mechanics

All or almost all of my entries use correct spelling and grammar.

Most of my entries use correct spelling and grammar.

Few of my entries use correct spelling and grammar.

None of my entries use correct spelling and grammar.

Completion

All entries are present, in order, and together.

All entries are present, but are either not together or in order.

All entries are not present, but they are together or in order.

All entries are not present, nor are they together or in order.

 

Weather Journal Rubric 

Observations

4

3

2

1

Overall Weather

Very detailed descriptions of daily weather everyday.

Detailed descriptions of daily weather on most days.

Detailed descriptions of daily weather on some days.

Many descriptions missing or most lack detail.

Temperature

High and low temperature marked daily.

High and low temp-erature marked, but a few missing days or wrong temperatures.

High and low temp-erature marked, but a several missing days or wrong temperatures.

Many temperatures missing or very inaccurate.

Cloud Formations

Very detailed descriptions of types of clouds at least three times a week.

Detailed descriptions of types of clouds at least twice a week.

Descriptions of clouds present but not detailed or only once a week.

Descriptions of clouds missing or very inaccurate.

Humidity / Dryness

Very detailed descriptions of humidity at least three times a week.

Detailed descriptions of humidity at least twice a week.

Descriptions of humidity present but not detailed or only once a week.

Descriptions of humidity missing or very inaccurate.

Precipitation

Very detailed descriptions of precipitation at least three times a week.

Detailed descriptions of precipitation at least twice a week.

Descriptions of precipitation present but not detailed or only once a week.

Descriptions of precipitation missing or very inaccurate.

General Mood of the Day

Detailed reflection based on all the aspects taken.

Reflection uses many observations, but missing details of one or two aspects.

Reflection uses many observations, but missing details of three or four aspects.

Reflection uses many observations, but missing details of all aspects.

Organization

Extremely organized, with each day dated.

Mostly organized or out of order.

Somewhat organized.

Poor organizational effort.

 

Playlist Rubric

 

Name:                                                Period:                         Due Date:                           

 

Your mission is to come up with a 5 song playlist that the lyrics or tone of the songs relate to your life or who you are.  For each song you must have the name of the song, the artist’s name, and a brief comment as to how that song is descriptive of you. 

 

 

3

clear, achieved

2

foggy, attempted

1

?, absent

Ideas

- 5 songs

- Clearly identifies why each song fits the theme due to lyrics or tone of the tune.

- Reasoning for songs in playlists is clear and convincing.

- Song title and artist/ composer are clearly identified for each song.

- 3-4 songs

- Does not identify why all songs fit the theme, due to lyrics or tone of the tune.

- Reasoning for some  songs is clear  or  evidence for some songs are clear while some are still foggy.

- Shows some evidence to connect life and music.

- Song title and artist/ composer are not identified for all songs.

- 1-2 songs

- Songs feel randomly chosen.

- Little to no reasoning for choosing songs

- Little to no evidence to connect life and music

- Song titles and/or artist/composer are missing.

Organization

- Presented in an understandable way with written explanation.

- Order of songs flow easily from one song to the next and fit along with the theme.

- Format is jumbled and somewhat difficult for reader to understand

- Flow of songs appear jumbled and don’t follow along.

- Unclear what you are attempting to do

- Song order is unorganized  and unable for the viewer to understand.

Sentence Fluency/Voice

 

    Sensory images

    Details

    Inferences

    Figurative language

    Different types of sentences

    Gives the reader a concrete connection

- Controls details—uses details from life and music to make connections for the viewer

- Music choices reflect the theme in the life creating a multi-media connection that resonates with the viewer

- Details from life and music don’t make a clear connection for the viewer.

- Very literal connection between life and lyrics

- Music choices reflect theme creating a multi-media connection for the viewer.

- Repeated sentence structure

- Run on sentences

- …and then…and then…

- List of  facts

- Connection can not be identified or inferred by viewer

 

2

1

0

Conventions

   Spelling

   Punctuation

  Verb tense (present)

- Some conventional errors

- Reader can still understand (forgivable)

- Conventional errors are distracting to the reader

- Unreadable due to conventional errors

 

 Rubric for Graph

Criteria

Novice (1)

Developing (2)

Standard (3)

Exemplary (4)

Label

Student did not use any labels on graph

Student labeled title but did not label both axes.

Student accurately and clearly labeled title and one axis or both axis labeled but no titled

Student accurately and clearly labeled title and variable on horizontal and vertical axis.

Data Points

1/4 or fewer data points are accurately plotted.

1/2 of data points are accurately plotted.

3/4 of data points are accurately plotted.

All data points are accurately plotted.

Intervals

None Expected

Student does not accurately use intervals on either axis.

Student accurately uses intervals on one axis.

Student accurately uses intervals on both axes.

 

Visual Collage Rubric

Student Name: ________________  Score: ____________

 

CATEGORY

4   (100 – 90)

3   (89-75)

2   (74 – 60)

1  (59-below)

Overall Impression

The collage fully reflects the student’s life and events.

The collage communicates some aspects of the student’s life and events

The collage presents words and images that relate to their life, but it fails to communicate who the student is as a person.

The collage does not adequately reflect the student’s life and events.

Specific Words and Images

All words and images are related to the topic and make it easier to understand the author’s perspective.

All words and images are related to the topic and most make it easier to understand the author’s perspective.

All words and images relate to the topic.

Words and images do not relate to the topic OR

Design

Graphics are trimmed or cropped to an appropriate size and interesting shape and are arranged well, some in front and some behind. Care has been taken to balance the pictures across the collage.

Graphics are trimmed or cropped to an appropriate size and interesting shape and are arranged with some items in front and others behind. The collage however does not appear balanced.

Graphics have been trimmed or cropped to an appropriate size and shape, but the arrangement of items is not very attractive. It appears there was not a lot of planning of the item placement.

Graphics are untrimmed or not cropped OR of inappropriate size and/or shape. It appears little attention was given to designing the collage.

Technical Construction

The collage shows considerable attention to construction. The collage is exceptionally attractive in terms of design, layout, and neatness.

The collage shows attention to construction. The collage is attractive in terms of design, layout and neatness.

The collage shows some attention to construction. The collage is acceptably attractive though it may be a bit messy.

The collage was put together sloppily. The collage is distractingly messy or very poorly designed. It is not attractive.

 

 

Conclusion

Now that you have completed this WebQuest you have had the chance to learn about the theory of Multiple Intelligences. You have also had a chance to complete (at least) one activity which is indicative of each of the Multiple Intelligences. They are as follows: (Fell free to follow the links for any of the Intelligences that you would like more information about).

Reflection 1. Interpersonal Intelligence

Weather Diary. Naturalistic Intelligence

Reflection 2. Intrapersonal Intelligence

i-Pod play list. Musical–rhythmic Intelligence

Create a graph. Logical–mathematical Intelligence

Reflection 3. Existential Intelligence

College Collage. Visual–spatial Intelligence

Reflection 4.  Bodily–kinesthetic Intelligence

All of the reflections are also a demonstration of the Verbal-Linguistic Intelligence.

 

As you finish this WebQuest reflect up on the following two things and share with me via Google Docs.

  1. Which of the activities did you most enjoy doing? This should be an indication as to your Multiple Intelligence strength.
  2. Did the answer to the previous question match the results you obtained when you took the Multiple Intelligence quiz at the beginning of this WebQuest?

External Links for further study and/or

Further Reading

                              courtesy Wikipedia

  • Kavale, Kenneth A.; Forness, Steven R. (1987), "Substance over style: Assessing the efficacy of modality testing and teaching", Exceptional Children 54: 228–239
  • Klein, Perry, D. (1997), "Multiplying the problems of intelligence by eight: A critique of Gardner's theory", Canadian Journal of Education 22 (4): 377–394, doi:10.2307/1585790JSTOR 1585790
  • Kornhaber, Mindy (2004), "Psychometric Superiority? Check the Facts",  Fierros, Mindy; Veenema, Shirley (2003), "Multiple Intelligences: Best Ideas from Research and Practice", 
  • Lohman, D. F. (2001), "Fluid intelligence, inductive reasoning, and working memory: Where the theory of Multiple Intelligences falls short", in Colangelo, N.; Assouline, S., Talent Development IV: Proceedings from the 1998 Henry B. & Jocelyn Wallace National Research Symposium on talent development (PDF), Great Potential Press, pp. 219–228, ISBN 978-0-910707-39-8
  • Kincheloe, Joe L.; Nolan, Kathleen; Progler, Yusef; Appelbaum, Peter; Cary, Richard; Blumenthal-Jones, Donald S.; Morris, Marla; Lemke, Jay L.; Cannella, Gaile S.; Weil, Danny; Berry, Kathleen S. (2004), Kincheloe, Joe L., ed., Multiple Intelligences Reconsidered, Counterpoints v. 278, Peter Lang, ISBN 978-0-8204-7098-6ISSN 1058-1634lay summary (4 September 2010)
  • Sempsey, James (1993), "The Pedagogical Implications Of Cognitive Science and Howard Gardner's M.I. Theory (A Critique
  • Sternberg, R. J. (1988), The triarchic mind: A new theory of human intelligence, Penguin Books
  • Waterhouse, Lynn (Fall 2006), "Inadequate Evidence for Multiple Intelligences, Mozart Effect, and Emotional Intelligence Theories", Educational Psychologist 41 (4): 247–255, doi:10.1207/s15326985ep4104_5
Credits

Asian Institute of Technology. (n.d.). Retrieved from http://www.ait.ac.th/education/LanguageCenter/ait-writing-services/guide-book/conclusion.html#.VISncjHF_lFCollage rubric Google. (n.d.). Retrieved December 3, 2014, from https://www.google.com/webhp?sourceid=chrome-instant&rlz=1C1SFXN_enUS49… Collage Rubric&safe=active&ssui=onDermatoglyphics Multiple Intelligences Test (DMIT): A fundamental review! (2014, April 8). Retrieved from http://www.handresearch.com/news/dermatoglyphics-multiple-intelligences-test-dmit.htmE-safety and Web 2.0 for children aged 11-16. (2009, February 1). Retrieved December 1, 2014, from http://ezproxy.lib.ucalgary.ca:2048/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=eric&AN=EJ824887&site=ehost-liveGraph Rubric Google. (n.d.). Retrieved December 1, 2014, from https://www.google.com/webhp?sourceid=chrome-instant&rlz=1C1SFXN_enUS49… rubric&safe=active&ssui=onImage courtesy of Spark Notes http://www.sparknotes.com/missmarm/2010/01/07/the-just-right-conclusion-paragraphImage courtesy of http://www.yetiarts.com/aaron/comics/images/fiske/thinker.jpgMcConnell, M. (2012, August 14). Making Utah education exceptional – improving teacher evaluation. Retrieved December 1, 2014, from http://educatingourselves.blogs.deseretnews.com/2012/08/14/making-utah-… Intelligences in the Everyday Classroom. (n.d.). Retrieved December 1, 2014, from https://miintheeverydayclassroom.wordpress.com/tag/multiple-intelligence/Playlist rubric (n.d.). Retrieved December 1, 2014, from http://www.9mile.org/cms/lib04/.../109/playlist_directions_and_rubric.docWeather rubric (n.d.). Retrieved December 1, 2014, from http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:plAEdkfl2cYJ:newtu… &cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us

Teacher Page

[img_assist|nid=19658|title=teacher1|desc=|link=none|align=left|width=640|height=443]

Introduction

 Initially this was to include a section on learning styles as well as various interest inventories, but upon reflection that became somewhat unwieldy. However, I would encourage any instructors who are using this WebQuest to seek to create or find individual units on each of the additional inter-related topics thereby allowing students to pursue those avenues in a depth to which they deserve.

This lesson allows students to explore the idea of Multiple Intelligences while determining their own Multiple Intelligence strength(s) in two different ways. The initial linked quiz allows students to get an idea of this strength while looking holistically at the entire concept. As they move through the remaining process of the WebQuest students are have an activity and learn via each of the Multiple Intelligences which allows them to participate in the reflection at the end of which of the Intelligences they preferred working in/with.

This lesson is designed to take place over several class periods. It is also designed to allow students to work at their own pace and to be able to start and stop easily.


Learners

This lesson is designed to assist Gifted Students in pursuing an affective IEP goal.

This lesson was developed for the use with gifted students grades 7 through 9. There are no prior learning requirements which the student needs before embarking upon this WebQuest. While it is not necessary, you and the students might get more out of this activity if the groundwork has been lain with respect to a general discussion of intelligence.

Curriculum Standards

As this lesson is created for gifted students, all curriculum standards will be from the National Association for Gifted Children 2010 Pre-K-Grade 12 Gifted Programming Standards

 

1.1. Self-Understanding. Students with gifts and talents demonstrate self-knowledge with respect to their interests, strengths, identities, and needs in

socio-emotional development and in intellectual, academic, creative, leadership, and artistic domains.

 

1.2. Self-Understanding. Students with gifts and talents possess a developmentally appropriate understanding of how they learn and grow; they

recognize the influences of their beliefs, traditions, and values on their learning and behavior.

 

1.3. Self-Understanding. Students with gifts and talents demonstrate understanding of and respect for similarities and differences between themselves

and their peer group and others in the general population.

 

1.7. Cognitive and Affective Growth. Students with gifts and talents recognize their preferred approaches to learning and expand their repertoire.

 

3.3. Talent Development. Students with gifts and talents develop their abilities in their domain of talent and/or area of interest.


Process

Prior to the introduction of this WebQuest, students should be familiar with how to create and share via google Docs. After which, follow the process page of the WebQuest.


Resources Needed

  • Class sets laptops or i-Pads (one per student)
  • E-mail accounts for all students
  • Google Docs
  • Students should already have an electronic journal, or a blog which can serve as such.

This lesson can easily be implemented by one teacher so long as you make a point to be moving throughout the room regularly to act as a resource and to ensure that students remain on task.


Evaluation

(See evaluation page of the WebQuest)

The important thing to consider, especially when evaluating the students’ collages and playlists is whether or not the task was successfully completed, rather than judging either on their artistic, or musical merit.


Conclusion

The strength of this lesson is that it allows students to tap into their strength of, and familiarity with, surfing the internet. It also allows and encourage students to pursue different avenues for answering the same question. By having students interact or perform assignments associated with each of the Multiple Intelligences they are given the opportunity to get a better idea as to how well they work within each Multiple Intelligence area.