Language (grammar, spelling, vocabulary, expression) |
The student doesn't demon-strate sufficient command of English: the vo- cabulary is not diverse and the student doesn't short sentences. There a are a lot of spelling or gram- mar errors and the presentation/ video and hard to follow. |
The student demonstrates sufficient command of English: the vocabulary is not diverse and the student uses short sentences. There a some spelling or grammar errors and the presentation/ video is not well- structured so it is hard to follow. |
The student demonstrates good command of English: the vo- cabulary is fairly diverse and the student uses short sentences. There a some spelling or grammar errors but the presentation/ video is well- structured so it is easy to follow. |
The student demonstrates very good command of English: the vocabulary is very diverse and the student uses short sentences. There a no (or very little) spelling or grammar errors and the presentation/ video is well-structured so it is easy to follow. |
25% |
Content |
The students are only able to pre- sent some of the relevant informa- tion about the text and researched topic. Details show little understanding of the topic and the students hardly explain their own opinion or justify it. |
The students are not able to present all the relevant infor-mation about the text and re- searched topic. Details show sufficient under-standing of the topic. They also explain their own opinion but don't justify it sufficiently. |
The students are able to present most of the relevant information about the text and researched topic. Details also show full understanding of the topic. They also explain their own opinion and justify it. |
The students are able to present all the relevant information about the text and researched topic and add interesting things they have found. Details also show full understanding of the topic. They also explain their own opinion and justify it. |
30% |
Creativity (PPT and video) |
The text and video are not presented in an interesting way. The video does not explain the researched topic, doesn't present the infor- mation in an enter- taining way and does not include different kinds of presentation. |
The text and video are not always presented in an interesting way. The video explains the researched topic badly, doesn't present the information in an entertaining way and it does not include different kinds of presentation. |
The text and video are presented in an interesting way. The video explains the researched topic and presents the information in an entertaining way. But it does not include different kinds of presen- tation (e.g. acting, singing etc.). |
The text and video are presented in an interesting way. The video explains the researched topic and presents the information in an entertaining way. It also includes different kinds of presentation (e.g. acting, singing, pictures etc.). |
25% |
Graphics/ Technical Knowledge (PPT and video) |
The presentation shows that the students are not able to use PPT and hardly use different kind of multimedia or colors. The slides are hard to read and even lack information. The video is not edited at all. |
The presentation shows that the students are more or less able to use PPT and hardly use different kind of multimedia or colors. The slides are often hard to read and lack or are to full of information. The video is edited badly and is not easy to follow. |
The presentation shows that the stu- dents are able to use PPT efficient- ly and hardly use different kind of multimedia or co- lors. The slides are sometimes hard to read and are a little to full of informa- tion. The video is not edited very well and is not always easy to follow. |
The presentation re- flects a high know- ledge of PPT and di- verse of multimedia and colors. The PPT is eye-catching and easy to follow. The slides are also easy to read. There is not too much or not en- ough information. The video is easy to follow and seems to be edited in a pro- fessional way. |
20% |