Introduction
Types of neurons
Task
Write a scientific paper of two pages with the correct structure. They must print them in two different pages. The first page must content a headline which makes you follow with the reading, as a title of the newspaper. Also the first page must content an abstract, in a box with some different letters to let me see the difference with the rest of the text; and an image at list of the choosen neuron.
Process
Each group have to choose a neuron a write a scientific article of two pages including images. They have to be written as scientific paper structure, so, two columns and small letter. It needs to have this parts:
1. Abstract
2. Introduction: here you have to put some facts about the type of neuron you choose and also, and very important, the parts of the neuron you choose and their function.
3. Research: here you have to do a research work in pages like pubmed to find interesting facts and curiosities about the neuron you choose
4. Conclusion: here you have to do a collective conclusion and also each one of the group have to give their opinion.
5. Bibliography: all the pages you used.
Evaluation
|
Excellent |
Good |
Mediocre |
Poor |
Headline |
If the headline shocks me |
The headline make me follow reading |
The headline is not very shocking but the format is ok |
No shocking headline and no shocking letters |
Abstract |
Correct writing and spelling, correct information, and summarize all the text |
Correct writing and spelling, correct information but not summarize the text |
Correct writing and spelling, not enough information and not summarize the text |
Some grammar and spelling mistakes, not enough information and not summarize the text |
Introduction |
All the necessary information is in the text, the image is incredible and all the parts are correct |
All the necessary information in the text, the image is normal and there are missing parts |
Enough information, image not very useful and parts not well described |
Lack of basic information, and image and parts missing or not well described |
Research |
The facts presented are new, shocking and they found it in official pages |
The facts presented are new, shocking but some of they are founded in unofficial pages |
The facts presented are new but not shocking nor they found in unofficial pages |
The facts presented aren’t new |
Conclusion |
They summarize everything at the end, and they give a strong and clear opinion |
They summarize everything at the end, and they give at the end opinions but not clear and repeating the summary |
They summarize everything at the end but there are not a clear opinion of all the members |
They don’t give a collective opinion or summary and they don’t give the opinion of all the members of the group |
Structure |
Structured in two columns, with the correct space between lines, with the correct number of letters, in the correct order. |
Structured in one column, with the correct space between lines, with the correct number of letters, in the correct order. |
Structured in one column, with a lot of space between lines, not with the correct number of letters, in the correct order. |
Structured in one column, with a lot of space between lines, not with the correct number of letters, in the wrong order. |
Conclusion
Hopefully this project is laid out clearly so that each member understands their duties in the group in order to create a positive group experience. The teacher will be helping them to do the research in important and official pages in order to improve their researching and criteria skills.